LogRiteLogRite

For the people who sign,
and the people who ship.

Governance fails when the person accountable for the controls and the person who has to implement them are using different tools. LogRite is one platform for both.

Governance, risk and compliance leaders

Heads of GRC & compliance

Signing for controls that have to actually run.

Compliance teams write the framework mapping and answer for it when an assessor asks whether a control is actually running. LogRite turns those frameworks into controls that run, and produces the record as the work happens.

Select a maintained framework, customize it, or write a new one
Controls in plain English, no engineering ticket required
Evidence produced continuously, not assembled before an audit

CISOs & security leaders

Accountable for AI nobody can see.

Every team is shipping AI features and every one of them is a new path for data to leave. LogRite provides one control point across the lifecycle and one record of what happened, so security leaders can approve AI adoption instead of trying to slow it down.

One set of controls across code, AI calls, and logs already written
Sensitive data held at the boundary, not discovered later
A complete record of what was evaluated and why

AI governance & risk owners

The mandate has landed.

Regulators now expect an organization to demonstrate it is governing AI, not just that it intends to, and for federal teams M-26-14 puts a date on it. LogRite is where those controls become operational.

Frameworks mapped and maintained, including federal M-26-14
Maturity scored, with an exportable plan
Controls version-controlled and reviewable, like any other code

Platform, security and engineering teams

Platform & security engineering

LogRite goes in behind an existing provider key, starts in observation mode, and works on top of the Splunk or Datadog already in place. Nothing enforces until the team decides it does.

SRE & operations

When a control breaks, Cortex traces it to the cause and raises the fix as a pull request, so the investigation is not a manual hunt through logs at midnight.

Developers

The logging compliance frameworks require is proposed as a reviewable PR against the existing codebase, instead of arriving as a checklist from an unfamiliar team.

One platform, two jobs. The people who answer for the controls and the people who implement them stop working in separate systems.

With and without LogRite

Not a feature list. The difference in what can actually be answered, and what lands on someone's desk when it does not go to plan.

Without LogRite
LogRite
Controls
Attested to once a year, then forgotten
A system that runs every day
Is the control on?
Ask around, and hope
Visible, framework by framework
Unapproved AI
Found after something goes wrong
Seen at the boundary, as it happens
Sensitive data in logs
Nobody has looked
Checked against the same controls
Preparing for an audit
Weeks of screenshots and spreadsheets
A record produced as the work happened
When a control breaks
A ticket, then a manual hunt through logs
Root cause traced and the fix raised as a PR
How engineering sees it
More compliance work from another team
A pull request they can read and merge

The work does not get bigger. It stops being manual.

Bring whoever owns the controls.

Fifteen minutes, your frameworks, your systems. We will show you what is already happening that you cannot currently see.